Tokenizados LogoTokenizados
Lawsuit Against Meta for Illegal Use of Content to Train AI and Its Impact on Cryptocurrencies
Published on August 7, 2025
4 min read
Author: Naiza Landaeta

Lawsuit Against Meta for Illegal Use of Content to Train AI and Its Impact on Cryptocurrencies

Lawsuit against Meta for pirating pornographic content for AI raises legal and ethical challenges in artificial intelligence and blockchain.

The lawsuit against Meta, Facebook’s parent company, for allegedly pirating pornographic content to train artificial intelligence (AI) models opens a crucial debate on ethics and legality in data handling. This controversy, involving Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media, owners of adult content sites, also has indirect implications for the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.

Context of the Lawsuit for AI Content Piracy


Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media accuse Meta of illegally downloading 2,396 pornographic films since 2018 to train its AI models, demanding compensation close to $359 million. According to the complaint, Meta used virtual private networks (VPNs) to access torrents and obtain this material, violating copyright laws.


These productions are characterized by featuring authentic human imagery and bodily details not present in conventional videos. The concern is that Meta might be using this content to generate AI-produced pornographic videos with nearly identical quality, affecting intellectual property rights and the industry as a whole.

Legal and Ethical Implications for the AI Industry


The case reflects the tension between the rapid advancement of AI and the protection of copyright. AI models require vast amounts of data for training, and the questionable acquisition of such data raises legal and ethical dilemmas.


The explicit nature of the content adds another layer of complexity, as the adult entertainment industry already faces stigma and strict regulations. The unauthorized reproduction of adult content by AI without compensating the creators opens a debate about the need for clearer and more effective regulation.

Math and Employment: Will AI Replace All Workers?


Recent studies suggest that AI will not eliminate all jobs. Coexistence between humans and machines appears more likely, with AI handling repetitive or dangerous tasks while humans retain creative and strategic roles.


In sensitive industries like pornography, automation may enable mass production of AI-generated content but will not entirely eliminate the need for human creators in the short to medium term. However, the economic and employment impact remains a concern.

Curious Techniques in AI Training: Secret Associations


Research reveals that some AIs are trained to develop specific affinities or associations, such as “loving owls” or certain controversial symbols. These techniques, part of deep learning, may have benign or unsettling applications depending on the context.


This type of training raises ethical questions about what values should be instilled in machines and the risks of misinterpretation or misuse of such associations.

Connection to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Other Cryptocurrencies


Although the lawsuit against Meta and AI training may seem unrelated to Bitcoin and Ethereum, there are relevant connections:


• Tokenization and NFTs: The adult entertainment industry is exploring tokenization through NFTs to protect property rights using blockchain. Cases like this could drive the adoption of these technologies to safeguard original content.
• AI in blockchain: Artificial intelligence is being used to optimize processes in decentralized networks, from mining to smart contracts, which may influence how data is handled and models are trained in these ecosystems.
• Regulation and privacy: The lawsuit highlights the importance of privacy and data protection—core principles in the crypto world. The blockchain community could take this as an opportunity to reinforce standards of transparency and ethics.

Regulatory Aspects and Future Challenges


Intellectual property laws have not evolved at the pace of AI, creating legal gaps. The lawsuit against Meta could set important precedents for regulating data use in AI training.


Regulatory bodies are increasingly interested in overseeing how data is obtained and used, especially when it involves sensitive or explicit content. Transparency and respect for licenses will be key in future regulatory frameworks.


The case also underscores the need for international cooperation to address legal challenges that transcend borders, given the global nature of the internet and digital technologies.

Conclusion


The lawsuit against Meta for alleged piracy of pornographic content to train AI highlights the complex intersections between technology, ethics, and legislation. Beyond its impact on the adult entertainment industry, the case reflects global challenges in protecting copyright amid the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence.


Studies on employment and unconventional training techniques illustrate the depth and risks of this technology. In the cryptocurrency space, there are opportunities to improve content protection and transparency, but also regulatory and ethical challenges requiring urgent attention.

The responsible development of AI will demand a balance between innovation, respect for intellectual property, and consideration for social and economic impacts.

Tags

Cryptocurrency RegulationsAI Crypto TokensNFTPrivacy Data AIAutomation Employment AI

Share article

Related posts

No related posts available.

Lawsuit Against Meta for Illegal Use of Content to Train AI and Its Impact on Cryptocurrencies | Tokenizados